(The Impossibility of) Deliberation‐Consistent Social Choice
نویسندگان
چکیده
There is now a growing consensus among democratic theorists that we should incorporate both “democratic deliberation” and “aggregative voting” into our processes. But how the two mechanisms of deliberation voting interact? In this article, introduce new axiom, which call “Nonnegative Response toward Successful Deliberation” (NNRD). The basic idea if some individuals change their preferences other individuals’ through deliberation, then social choice rule not make everybody who has successfully persuaded others reasoned worse off than what they would have achieved without deliberation. We prove an impossibility theorem shows there exists no aggregation can simultaneously satisfy NNRD along with mild axioms reflect deliberative democracy's core commitment to unanimous political equality. offer potential escape routes; however, each route succeed only by compromising value democracy.
منابع مشابه
Arrow’s Impossibility Theorem on Social Choice Systems
Social choice theory is a field that concerns methods of aggregating individual interests to determine net social preferences. Arrow’s Impossibility Theorem states that no social choice system can satisfy all requirements in a collection of “reasonable” criteria. We make the notion of “reasonable” voting systems precise by stating the four properties that voting systems must have in order to be...
متن کاملA general impossibility result on strategy-proof social choice hyperfunctions
A social choice hyperfunction picks a non-empty set of alternatives at each admissible preference profile over sets of alternatives. We analyze the manipulability of social choice hyperfunctions. We identify a domain D of lexicographic orderings which exhibits an impossibility of the Gibbard-Satterthwaite type. Moreover, this impossibility is inherited by all well-known superdomains of D. As mo...
متن کاملSome Results for Impossibility Theorems of Social Welfare Function and Social Choice Function
We present some results on social welfare function and social choice function. First, we replace weak Pareto principle of Arrow’s axioms with strong Pareto principle, and then show that assuming unrestricted domain property, independence of irrelevant alternatives and strong Pareto principle on a social welfare function in Arrow’s sense leads to the existence of first to nth commanders whose st...
متن کاملArrow’s Impossibility Theorem: The Logic of Dictatorship and the Meaning of Social Choice
The paper pays critical tribute to Arrow’s (1951) analysis of social choice by focusing on a number of the foundational, conceptual and interpretational issues to which it gives rise. It begins with a discussion of justifications of other formal requirements, namely unrestricted domain, Pareto optimality and independence of irrelevant alternatives, before proceeding to a detailed analysis of th...
متن کاملذخیره در منابع من
با ذخیره ی این منبع در منابع من، دسترسی به آن را برای استفاده های بعدی آسان تر کنید
ژورنال
عنوان ژورنال: American Journal of Political Science
سال: 2023
ISSN: ['1540-5907', '0092-5853']
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/ajps.12792